For the college fans having opinions regarding universities and players connected to illegal benefits, the NCAA showed there’s a double standard in its investigations.
The decision to rule Auburn QB Cameron Newton eligible raises many eyebrows on the conduct of universities in regards to recruiting. It's fair to say the public needs a better understanding what the punishments are if any kid takes money. The end result usually is a suspension and expulsion from the team.
There are many questions to be answered when evidence showed that Cecil Newton, Cameron’s father, took money for his son’s commitment to Auburn. So why did the NCAA rule him eligible for this Saturdays SEC Championship game?
The conspiracy theories have already begun from chat rooms to college football message boards.
Would the NCAA made the same decision if Auburn was 9-2 or 8-3?
Is the Southern Eastern Conference scared in losing a slot in the BCS title game where the two teams would reportedly receive about $16-$18 million each from the sponsors? If Cam Newton was ruled ineligible for Saturday game, the Tigers would not beat the Gamecocks.
Read on South Carolina vs. Auburn Football, Week 4Auburn vs. Mississippi State 2010 Football PreviewConference Expansion Could Change College Football Forever
Auburn played South Carolina on Sept. 25th where they needed Newton’s heroics for a 35-27 victory. It’s hard to imagine the Tigers beating the same opponent twice if its best player wasn’t there.
Make any argument you want, but the ruling doesn't say much for the NCAA and its plans for disciplinary action.
Former U.S.C. running back Reggie Bush took money and benefits from the university during the 2004-2005 seasons. The Trojans punishment was a two-year ban on post-season play and loses of scholarships. The ultimate punishment was Bush giving back his Heisman Trophy on Sept. 14th.
When word leaked out about Cecil Newton taking $180,000 for his son’s commitment to Auburn, people were crawling out of the woodwork when that story broke. Everyday sources were saying they received text messages or written statements on what it would take for his son’s commitment. The evidence was overwhelming and took about five weeks to investigate. Were now expected to believe that Cam Newton had no idea what his father was doing according to the NCAA.
The NCAA sent a strong message during the USC investigation and lost all credibility with today’s ruling on Newton. They had a chance to crackdown what universities and players are doing regarding illegal benefits and blew it a major way.
Copyright Jonathan Cisowski. Contact the author to obtain permission for republication. Print Article
View the Original article